WebApr 9, 1997 · Daughtrey v. Ashe, 243 Va. 73, 413 S.E.2d 336 (1992). In Daughtrey, a jeweler had described a gem as being of higher quality than it actually was. In a subsequent breach of warranty suit, the jeweler asserted that the buyer had not been aware of the description and had not relied upon it. The Virginia Supreme Court held that it did not …
Daughtrey v. Ashe Case Brief for Law Students Casebriefs
WebDaughtrey v. Fall 2024 - Section 2-313 relates to the creation of express warranties - Studocu Anderson Fall 2024 section relates to the creation of express warranties the … WebDaughtrey v. Ashe Virginia Supreme Court 413 S.E.2d 336 (1992) Facts Daughtrey (plaintiff) purchased a diamond bracelet from Ashe (defendant) for a price of $15,000. … maritime garage norwalk
Daughtrey v. Ashe Casebriefs
Webquestion of fact. See id., Official Comment 3; Daughtrey v. Ashe, 243 Va. 73, 78, 413 S.E.2d 336, 339 (1992). In Daughtrey, we examined whether a jeweler's statement on an appraisal form constituted an express warranty. We held that the jeweler's 2Because our rulings on the warranty issues are dispositive WebAshe offered to refund the purchase price but Daughtrey refused because diamond prices had risen substantially since he had originally purchased the bracelet. Daughtrey sued Ashe on the basis of breach of an express warranty. Ashe claimed that he made no express warranty because he described the stones as “nice diamonds” only. WebJan 11, 2008 · Comment 3; Daughtrey v. Ashe, 243 Va. 73, 78, 413 S.E.2d 336, 339 (1992). In Daughtrey, we examined whether a jeweler’s statement on an appraisal form constituted an express warranty. We held that the jeweler’s description of the particular diamonds being purchased as "v.v.s. quality" constituted an express warranty that the … maritime gardening podcast